Smith v. State
This text of 106 So. 817 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The trial court erred in ruling out the testimony of the witness Ellen Moore. Richardson v. State, 100 Miss. 514, 56 So. 454. The admissions made to her by the child claimed to have been ravished tended to account for the physical condition of the child found by the examing physicians. We think the ruling out of this testimony denied appellant of a substantial right. It was harmful.
We are of opinion that no other reversible error was committed in the trial of the cause.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 817, 141 Miss. 630, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-miss-1926.