Smith v. State

106 So. 817, 141 Miss. 630, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 455
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1926
DocketNo. 25100.
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 817 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 106 So. 817, 141 Miss. 630, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 455 (Mich. 1926).

Opinion

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The trial court erred in ruling out the testimony of the witness Ellen Moore. Richardson v. State, 100 Miss. 514, 56 So. 454. The admissions made to her by the child claimed to have been ravished tended to account for the physical condition of the child found by the examing physicians. We think the ruling out of this testimony denied appellant of a substantial right. It was harmful.

We are of opinion that no other reversible error was committed in the trial of the cause.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. State
56 So. 454 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 817, 141 Miss. 630, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-miss-1926.