Smith v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Smith v. State

65 So. 642, 107 Miss. 404

DecidedMarch 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 642 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 65 So. 642, 107 Miss. 404 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first and second instructions to the jury granted by the court below at the request of the state permitted [410]*410the jury to convict appellant without it appearing from the evidence: First, that Cox had sold Beardsley cocaine; second, that Beardsley knew that Cox was the person who sold him the cocaine; third, that appellant knew that, in event Beardsley testified that he did not know who sold him the cocaine, he would he stating that which was false. That the state must prove these facts was ignored in the first and second instructions granted at the request of the state wherein the jury were charged to convict in event appellant sought to induce Beardsley by the offer of money to commit perjury by stating “that he did not buy cocaine from the said Cox and that he did not know said Cox.”

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first and second instructions to the jury granted by the court below at the request of the state permitted [410]*410the jury to convict appellant without it appearing from the evidence: First, that Cox had sold Beardsley cocaine; second, that Beardsley knew that Cox was the person who sold him the cocaine; third, that appellant knew that, in event Beardsley testified that he did not know who sold him the cocaine, he would he stating that which was false. That the state must prove these facts was ignored in the first and second instructions granted at the request of the state wherein the jury were charged to convict in event appellant sought to induce Beardsley by the offer of money to commit perjury by stating “that he did not buy cocaine from the said Cox and that he did not know said Cox.”

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 So. 642, 107 Miss. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-miss-1914.