Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Smith v. State

214 N.E.2d 179, 247 Ind. 191, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 321

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 1966·No. No. 0-758·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner had filed a petition for permission to file a belated motion for a new trial in the Vigo Circuit Court. Upon the denial of permission to file a belated motion for a new trial, he filed his petition in this court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the trial court.

[192] He has now by letter informed the- court that he has been granted parole and wishes to dismiss his petition for writ of certiorari.

Said petition is now dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 179.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner had filed a petition for permission to file a belated motion for a new trial in the Vigo Circuit Court. Upon the denial of permission to file a belated motion for a new trial, he filed his petition in this court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the trial court.

[192] He has now by letter informed the- court that he has been granted parole and wishes to dismiss his petition for writ of certiorari.

Said petition is now dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 179.

Smith v. State, 214 N.E.2d 179, 247 Ind. 191, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 321 (Ind. 1966).

Pincite

214 N.E.2d 179 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.