Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Smith v. State

214 N.E.2d 179, 247 Ind. 191, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 321

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 21, 1966

DocketNo. 0-758

StatusPublished

This text of 214 N.E.2d 179 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 214 N.E.2d 179, 247 Ind. 191, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 321 (Ind. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner had filed a petition for permission to file a belated motion for a new trial in the Vigo Circuit Court. Upon the denial of permission to file a belated motion for a new trial, he filed his petition in this court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the trial court.

[192]*192He has now by letter informed the- court that he has been granted parole and wishes to dismiss his petition for writ of certiorari.

Said petition is now dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 179.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner had filed a petition for permission to file a belated motion for a new trial in the Vigo Circuit Court. Upon the denial of permission to file a belated motion for a new trial, he filed his petition in this court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the trial court.

[192]*192He has now by letter informed the- court that he has been granted parole and wishes to dismiss his petition for writ of certiorari.

Said petition is now dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 214 N. E. 2d 179.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 N.E.2d 179, 247 Ind. 191, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ind-1966.