Smith v. State

132 N.E. 680, 191 Ind. 704, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 71
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1921
DocketNo. 23,993
StatusPublished

This text of 132 N.E. 680 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 132 N.E. 680, 191 Ind. 704, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 71 (Ind. 1921).

Opinion

Travis, J.

—The appellant was prosecuted and found guilty by a verdict of the jury upon an affidavit which charged that he sold intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, in violation of §4, Acts 1917 p. 15, §8356a et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918.

The only error properly raised for review of this case is, “the verdict is contrary to law.”

The brief fails to give a narration of the evidence, it also fails to point out wherein the verdict is contrary to law, and there is no discussion or argument in the brief.

We have carefully examined the evidence in the record and fail' to find wherein the verdict is not supported by the evidence, and therefore conclude that it is not contrary to law.

Judgment affirmed.

Myers, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 N.E. 680, 191 Ind. 704, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ind-1921.