Smith v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 2023·No. SCPW-23-0000014·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

13-JAN-2023

08:30 AM

Dkt. 5 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

DEXTER J. SMITH, Petitioner, vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 1PR161000009)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the January 4, 2023 letter from Dexter J. Smith, which has been filed with this court as a petition for a writ of mandamus, we conclude Smith has failed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy, 82 Hawaiʻi 188, 193, 921 P.2d 108, 113 (1996). Therefore, It is ordered that the petition is denied.

It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall serve a copy of the petition and this order on Judge Christine Kuriyama.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 13, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, (haw 2023).

Smith v. State (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy
921 P.2d 108 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)