Smith v. State
This text of 166 S.E.2d 394 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The overruling of the motion for a new trial, by being neither specifically appealed from nor enumer[94]*94ated as error, became the law of the case as to the errors therein included, which comprise the enumeration of errors on this appeal from the judgment on the verdict. Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137), and cit. Accordingly, the judgment on the verdict must be, and is,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E.2d 394, 119 Ga. App. 93, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1969.