Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. State

189 S.E. 371, 55 Ga. App. 148, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 5

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1937

Docket25947

StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.E. 371 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 189 S.E. 371, 55 Ga. App. 148, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder. The jury found him guilty of voluntary manslaughter. The motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. A. J. Tuten, T. J. Townsend, I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error. John 8. Gibson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder. The jury found him guilty of voluntary manslaughter. The motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. A. J. Tuten, T. J. Townsend, I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error. John 8. Gibson, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.E. 371, 55 Ga. App. 148, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1937.