Smith v. State

164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 234, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 255
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 30, 1932
Docket22148
StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 108 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 234, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. His motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of [235]*235the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided April 30, 1932. Carl H. Griffin, G. E. Maddox, for plaintiff in error. M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, Horace E. Shattuclc, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 234, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1932.