Smith v. State

38 S.E. 955, 113 Ga. 645, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 27, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Eumpkin, P. J.

Evidence that the accused, who was charged with carrying a pistol concealed, owned such a weapon; that he carried it in an open manner from his home to a “ party ” which was had at night; that while at the same he accidentally shot another person with the pistol, and that the latter “ had seen [the accused] several times that night before pistol fired, and he saw no pistol till after he was shot,” was not sufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of every other rational hypothesis that the accused had the pistol on his person all of the time the “ party ” was in progress up to the moment when the weapon was fired, or that at any time on the night in question he actually had or carried the pistol on his person so concealed that it might not have been visible from some point of view not occupied by the person who was shot when he was looking at the- accused.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 38 S.E. 955, 113 Ga. 645, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1901).

38 S.E. 955 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
45 Ga. App. 603 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Sanders v. State
156 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)