Smith v. State
This text of Smith v. State (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 6, 2018. ________________
No. 3D14-1635 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10772 ________________
Earvin Smith, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo Orshan, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, LAGOA, SALTER, EMAS, FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, SCALES, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM. ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
This case returns to us from the Florida Supreme Court, which quashed that
portion of our earlier decision reversing Smith’s conviction and sentence for armed
burglary.1 See State v. Smith, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S177 (Fla. April 12, 2018). In
accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion and pursuant to its mandate,
we reinstate and affirm Earvin Smith’s conviction and sentence for armed
burglary.
1Smith v. State, 211 So. 3d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). We stayed the issuance of our mandate pending review by the Florida Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.