Smith v. State
221 So. 2d 216, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924
Opinion
The only question presented on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence as to the identity of the defendant-appellant. It is clear that where positive identification is made by one having an opportunity to observe the crime, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment as to the sufficiency of the identification. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264, and authorities cited therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 221 So. 2d 216, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
221 So. 2d 216 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cordero v. State
669 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Ayan v. State
488 So. 2d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Johnson v. State
348 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)