Smith v. State
167 So. 2d 53, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4104
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3775 →
Opinion
Defendant appeals from liis conviction of the crime of grand larceny. We have carefully reviewed the record, and discern no reversible error, and appellant raises no novel issues of law requiring our determination or' discussion. See Ard v. State, Fla.1959, 108 So.2d 38; Harrison v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 391.
Affirmed. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 167 So. 2d 53, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
167 So. 2d 53 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrison v. State
104 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Ard v. State
108 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)