Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Smith v. State

343 So. 2d 598, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3809

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1977·No. No. 47753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. The writ of certio-rari must be and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J, and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. [599] BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion with which ADKINS, J., concurs. ROBERTS (Retired), J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. The writ of certio-rari must be and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J, and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. [599] BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion with which ADKINS, J., concurs. ROBERTS (Retired), J., dissents.

Smith v. State, 343 So. 2d 598, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3809 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

343 So. 2d 598 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related