Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

343 So. 2d 598, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3809
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1977
DocketNo. 47753
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 So. 2d 598 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 343 So. 2d 598, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3809 (Fla. 1977).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. The writ of certio-rari must be and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J, and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. [599]*599BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion with which ADKINS, J., concurs. ROBERTS (Retired), J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tullis v. State
556 So. 2d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 So. 2d 598, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-fla-1977.