Smith v. State
167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664 (Fla. 1964).
167 So. 2d 225 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilhelm v. State
515 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Gervasio
462 A.2d 144 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State v. Gamble
370 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Gustafson v. State
243 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)