Smith v. State
167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664
This text of 167 So. 2d 225 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. State, 167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664 (Fla. 1964).
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilhelm v. State
515 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Gervasio
462 A.2d 144 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State v. Gamble
370 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Gustafson v. State
243 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-fla-1964.