Smith v. State

167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1964
DocketNo. 33038
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 167 So. 2d 225 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664 (Fla. 1964).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and CARROLL, District Court Judge, concur. THOMAS, J., dissents with opinion. ROBERTS and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., dissent and concur with THOMAS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilhelm v. State
515 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Gervasio
462 A.2d 144 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State v. Gamble
370 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Gustafson v. State
243 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 225, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-fla-1964.