Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

232 So. 2d 421, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6828
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1970·No. No. 68-699·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause recurs for consideration upon the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida pursuant to the opinion and judgment of that court filed February 4, 1970 (231 So.2d 193), disapproving the concluding paragraph with directions to eliminate said paragraph of the prior opinion and judgment of this court in this cause (Fla.App., 220 So.2d 389).

In accord with the directive of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, the concluding paragraph of our prior opinion and judgment is vacated, the said opinion and judgment is amended in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court and the cause is remanded to the trial court for its determination of allowable damages, under the express terms of the contract relating to loss occasioned by the temporary loss of use of the car.1

It is so ordered.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 232 So. 2d 421, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

232 So. 2d 421 (Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixie Farms, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.
343 So. 2d 633 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)