Smith v. State

959 S.W.2d 54, 331 Ark. 536, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 Ark. 190
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 19, 1998·No. CR 97-1190·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Benfordene Butler Smith, by her attorney, Willard Proctor, Jr., has filed a motion to extend time for filing brief.

Appellant’s brief was due on November 15, 1997. Appellant’s attorney admits that the brief has not been filed in a timely manner due to an error on his part. Specifically, appellant’s attorney failed to maintain the briefing schedule on his calendar. Furthermore, appellant’s motion to extend time for filing brief was not filed until January 14, 1998, after the Supreme Court Clerk sent a letter to appellant’s attorney regarding the status of briefing.

The motion to file belated brief is granted.

We routinely grant motions to file belated briefs. However, because of the long delay by appellant’s attorney, a copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 959 S.W.2d 54, 331 Ark. 536, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 102 (Ark. 1998).

959 S.W.2d 54 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.