Smith v. State

120 So. 917, 23 Ala. App. 73, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 63
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 460
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 1929·No. 8 Div. 810.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Over objection and exception of defendant seasonably reserved, the court admitted a transcript of the testimony of Johnnie James given and taken down on the preliminary hearing of this case. The predicate laid for the introduction of this evidence was as follows:

“Q. Where is he (Johnnie James) at this time? Ans. Pine Bluff,.Ark.

“Q. How long has he been there? Ans. Probably four or five months.”

No subpoena had been issued for Johnnie James, nor was there other evidence on this subject. The predicate laid was not sufficient. Hines v. Miniard, 208 Ala. 176, 94 So. 302; Kimble v. State, 21 Ala. App. 528, 109 So. 610.

Charges refused were covered by the court in his general charge or in other given charges.

Other rulings of the court were free from error.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 120 So. 917, 23 Ala. App. 73, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 63 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

120 So. 917 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimble v. State
109 So. 610 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Hines v. Miniard
94 So. 302 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)