Smith v. State

84 So. 860, 17 Ala. App. 345, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 36
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1920
Docket4 Div. 601.
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 860 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 84 So. 860, 17 Ala. App. 345, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 36 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of grand larceny and convicted as charged. From the judgment of conviction, he appeals to this court. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has long since expired. The record is free from error; the judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 860, 17 Ala. App. 345, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-alactapp-1920.