Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

71 So. 979, 14 Ala. App. 103, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 36

DecidedMay 18, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 71 So. 979 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 71 So. 979, 14 Ala. App. 103, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 36 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The term of imprisonment imposed as a punishment for the offense not exceeding two years, the sentence to hard labor for the county was proper (Code 1907, § 7620) ; and this is true, notwithstanding an additional sentence to hard labor was imposed for the payment of the costs.—Code 1907, § 7635; Evans v. State, 109 Ala. 12, 19 South. 535.

The record and proceedings of the trial court appearing in all things regular and free from error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, J.

The term of imprisonment imposed as a punishment for the offense not exceeding two years, the sentence to hard labor for the county was proper (Code 1907, § 7620) ; and this is true, notwithstanding an additional sentence to hard labor was imposed for the payment of the costs.—Code 1907, § 7635; Evans v. State, 109 Ala. 12, 19 South. 535.

The record and proceedings of the trial court appearing in all things regular and free from error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 979, 14 Ala. App. 103, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-alactapp-1916.