Smith v. State

86 So. 2d 842, 264 Ala. 264
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 12, 1956·No. 3 Div. 757·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

The petition in this case does not conform to the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 32, old Rule 36, in that the petition is not on transcript paper. Accordingly the petition must be dismissed. Latham v. State, 262 Ala. 108, 77 So.2d 502.

Petition dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 86 So. 2d 842, 264 Ala. 264 (Ala. 1956).

86 So. 2d 842 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. State
158 So. 2d 115 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Ex parte Smith
89 So. 2d 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)