Smith v. State

9 So. 2d 122, 243 Ala. 253, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 225
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 11, 1942·No. 8 Div. 150.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

*254 BOULDIN, Justice.

The bill of exceptions was not presented within the time required by law. It is due to be stricken on motion of the Attorney General filed and presented at the time of submission.

There being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 9 So. 2d 122, 243 Ala. 253, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 225 (Ala. 1942).

9 So. 2d 122 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

League of Women Voters v. Renfro
290 So. 2d 167 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)
Jones v. State
280 So. 2d 801 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Duke v. State
263 So. 2d 170 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)