Smith v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Stansberry

126 F. App'x 137

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2005·No. No. 04-7906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William C. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-557-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William C. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-557-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Smith v. Stansberry, 126 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 137 (Smith v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related