Home/Supreme Court of New Hampshire/Smith v. Stanley

Smith v. Stanley

36 A. 254, 67 N.H. 328
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 36 A. 254 (Smith v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Stanley, 36 A. 254, 67 N.H. 328 (N.H. 1892).

Opinion

Blobgett, J.

The probate court had no jurisdiction, and the assignment was a nullity. Ayer v. Weeks, 65 N. H. 248; McConnell v. Kelley, 138 Mass. 373. The appeal is sustained.

Decree of probate court reversed.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McConnell v. Kelley
138 Mass. 372 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A. 254, 67 N.H. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-stanley-nh-1892.