Smith v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.

152 S.E. 823, 156 S.C. 69, 1930 S.C. LEXIS 98
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 17, 1930·No. 12896·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Johnson, sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint and dismissing the action which was based upon the publication of an article in the newspaper of the defendants, as libelous.

It appears that the demurrer is based entirely upon the absence of a colloquium, the application of the publication to the plaintiff, which under Section 425 of the Code of Civil Procedure is no longer required. See Bell v. Clinton Mill, 129 S. C., 242, 124 S. E., 7; Duncan v. Record Co., *73 145 S. C., 196; 143 S. E., 31; Pierce v. Inter-Ocean Co., 148 S. C., 8, 145 S. E., 541; Spigner v. Provident Co., 148 S. C., 249, 146 S. E., 8.

The order appealed from' is reversed, and the case remanded.

Mr. Chief Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Brease, Stabrer and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co., 152 S.E. 823, 156 S.C. 69, 1930 S.C. LEXIS 98 (S.C. 1930).

152 S.E. 823 (Smith v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.
143 S.E. 31 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Pierce v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.
145 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Spigener v. Provident Life, Etc., Ins. Co.
146 S.E. 8 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Bell v. Clinton Oil Mill
124 S.E. 7 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)