Smith v. South Carolina Electric & Gas

40 F. App'x 868
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2002
DocketNo. 02-1451
StatusPublished

This text of 40 F. App'x 868 (Smith v. South Carolina Electric & Gas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. South Carolina Electric & Gas, 40 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bonnie G. Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice her civil rights complaint. The court dismissed Smith’s complaint based in part on her failure to allege specific facts supporting her claims of conspiracy or violation of her equal protection right.

Because Smith may be able to proceed with this action by amending her complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 F. App'x 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-south-carolina-electric-gas-ca4-2002.