Smith v. Social Security Administration

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

ARIEL MICHELE S.,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 2:24-cv-388 KRS

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff filed a Complaint on April 23, 2024, appealing the final decision of the Social Security Administration, which denied her claim for benefits. (Doc. 1). On May 13, 2024, the Court set a briefing schedule and ordered Plaintiff to file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision within thirty (30) days after the Commissioner files the Administrative Record. (Doc. 10). The Commissioner filed the Administrative Record on July 9, 2024, and mailed a paper copy of the Administrative Record to Plaintiff the same day. (Docs. 14, 15). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s brief was due thirty days later— on August 8, 2024. Plaintiff has neither filed a Motion to Remand nor requested an extension of time to do so. A district court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before September 6, 2024, Plaintiff shall either file a Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with a supporting memorandum of law, or file a response to this Order showing cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE