Smith v. Snell
11 Ky. 35, 1 Litt. 35, 1822 Ky. LEXIS 14
Opinion
THE only question presented in these cases, was, whether a plaintiff could lawfully sue out a ca. sa. where the defendant had, before the emanation of any execution, surrendered land lying in another county, and had made the affidavit and filed the title papers, as required by the acts of assembly—1 Dig. 514. The question was presented to the circuit court by writs of error coram vobis, and the decision was, that the plaintiff had a right to a ca. sa. An appeal was taken, and the decision of the circuit court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Snell, 11 Ky. 35, 1 Litt. 35, 1822 Ky. LEXIS 14 (Ky. Ct. App. 1822).
11 Ky. 35 (Smith v. Snell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sessmer v. Commonwealth
115 S.W.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Allen v. Perry
69 Ky. 85 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1869)
Finley v. Tyler
19 Ky. 400 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1826)
Bodwell v. Swan
20 Mass. 376 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)