Smith v. Smith

374 A.2d 121, 118 R.I. 944, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1642
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 R.I. 642
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 2, 1977·No. Appeal No. 76-245·Published

Opinion

The petitioner’s motion to vacate the Family Court order of March 15, 1977, which stayed support payments, is granted. See Devereaux v. McGarry’s, Inc., 107 R.I. 325, 266 A.2d 908 (1970); Hattie Carnegie Industries, Inc. v. Lopreato, 114 R.I. 319, 333 A.2d 145 (1975).

Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor, for petitioner. John D. Lynch, for respondent.

This order is without.prejudice to the respondent’s filing a motion for a stay in this court.

This case is specially assigned to the calendar for November 1977 for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 374 A.2d 121, 118 R.I. 944, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1642 (R.I. 1977).

374 A.2d 121 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hattie Carnegie Industries, Inc. v. Lopreato
333 A.2d 145 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1975)
Devereaux v. McGarry's, Inc.
266 A.2d 908 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1970)