Smith v. Smith

Washington County Court of Common Pleas

Smith v. Smith

87 Pa. D. & C. 204, 1953 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 209

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

DecidedJune 29, 1953

Docketno. 213

StatusPublished

This text of 87 Pa. D. & C. 204 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 87 Pa. D. & C. 204, 1953 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 209 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Gibson, P. J.,

When, defendant in a divorce case who, for many years, has lived in Massillon, Ohio, and all of the record shows that he continued to live there, conveniently arrives within the County of Washington within a few days after a divorce suit was instituted there, and is, promptly served by a constable who apparently was waiting for him and the circumstances are unaccounted for, the case must go back to the master that he may make a thorough investigation, to determine whether or not there is collusion. We are. not unmindful that plaintiff in her complaint states, .under oath, there is no collusion, but the circumstances indicate otherwise.

[205]*205And now, June 29, 1953, this case is referred hack to the master.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gibson, P. J.,

When, defendant in a divorce case who, for many years, has lived in Massillon, Ohio, and all of the record shows that he continued to live there, conveniently arrives within the County of Washington within a few days after a divorce suit was instituted there, and is, promptly served by a constable who apparently was waiting for him and the circumstances are unaccounted for, the case must go back to the master that he may make a thorough investigation, to determine whether or not there is collusion. We are. not unmindful that plaintiff in her complaint states, .under oath, there is no collusion, but the circumstances indicate otherwise.

[205]*205And now, June 29, 1953, this case is referred hack to the master.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 Pa. D. & C. 204, 1953 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-pactcomplwashin-1953.