Smith v. Smith Others

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Smith v. Smith Others

4 R.I. 370

DecidedSeptember 6, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 4 R.I. 370 (Smith v. Smith Others) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith Others, 4 R.I. 370 (R.I. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court. 1

The agreement evidently relates only to the costs accrued up to the time of the judgment for dower, which, though called a final judgment in the statute, requires to be followed by subsequent proceedings involving costs, upon the report of which, another judgment must be rendered, before the demandant can have her execution for damages for detention of dower, if any be awarded, and for possession of the premises admeasured to her by the commissioners. The waiver of the pleas interposed to delay the demandant’s recovery of this first judgment, seems to have been the consideration of her consent to exact no costs of the tenants ; and looking to this, as well as to the terms of the agreement minuted upon the docket, we think that the agreement is satisfied by our allowing the demandant to recover no costs accrued prior to her judgment for dower. As no provision is specially made by law for costs in actions of dower, the demandant must have all costs accruing subsequent to the first judgment, under our general statute rule in civil cases, that “ the party prevailing shall recover his costs.”

1

Judge Bosworth did not sit in this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court. 1

The agreement evidently relates only to the costs accrued up to the time of the judgment for dower, which, though called a final judgment in the statute, requires to be followed by subsequent proceedings involving costs, upon the report of which, another judgment must be rendered, before the demandant can have her execution for damages for detention of dower, if any be awarded, and for possession of the premises admeasured to her by the commissioners. The waiver of the pleas interposed to delay the demandant’s recovery of this first judgment, seems to have been the consideration of her consent to exact no costs of the tenants ; and looking to this, as well as to the terms of the agreement minuted upon the docket, we think that the agreement is satisfied by our allowing the demandant to recover no costs accrued prior to her judgment for dower. As no provision is specially made by law for costs in actions of dower, the demandant must have all costs accruing subsequent to the first judgment, under our general statute rule in civil cases, that “ the party prevailing shall recover his costs.”

1

Judge Bosworth did not sit in this cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 R.I. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-others-ri-1856.