Smith v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Smith v. Smith

670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2044

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 3, 1996

Docket96-960

StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 478 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2044 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 17462. On October 1, 1996, appellant filed a document titled “Objection to entry, a demand not to dismiss, a demand to correct errors, and a demand that the Court accept jurisdiction.” Appellant’s document is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration that was untimely filed. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of a motion for reconsideration that is not timely,

. IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the document be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 17462. On October 1, 1996, appellant filed a document titled “Objection to entry, a demand not to dismiss, a demand to correct errors, and a demand that the Court accept jurisdiction.” Appellant’s document is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration that was untimely filed. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of a motion for reconsideration that is not timely,

. IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the document be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ohio-1996.