Smith v. Smith

120 A.D.2d 581, 501 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56666
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.2d 810

Opinion

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated May 15, 1985, as, upon those branches of the plaintiff wife’s motion which were to sequester bank accounts belonging to him, and appoint her receiver thereof, directed sequestration of all of the defendant’s property in the State of New York and appointed the plaintiff the receiver thereof.

Order modified, by deleting from the third decretal paragraph the word "property” and substituting therefor the words "bank accounts”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s reference to Domestic Relations Law § 243 as requiring the posting of security by a receiver is unsupported. Moreover, no demand that such security be posted was made to Special Term nor was any objection made to the sequestration requested before the court. Nevertheless, the order should be amended by limiting the sequestration and the plaintiff’s role as receiver to the defendant’s bank accounts, since that is all the plaintiff requested in her affidavit in support of her motion. We reject the defendant’s other contentions. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 120 A.D.2d 581, 501 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

120 A.D.2d 581 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 243
New York DOM § 243