Smith v. Smith

249 A.D. 660, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5430
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1936·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The action, based upon a New Jersey decree of divorce granted to defendant by reason of plaintiff’s adultery, is to recover past due installments which the decree directed to be paid for the support of the issue of the marriage and to enforce payment in this State of the accrued installments and to provide for the payment of future installments and to afford plaintiff the remedies provided by sections 1171 and 1172 of the Civil Practice Act. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 650.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 249 A.D. 660, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

249 A.D. 660 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schoonheim v. Epstein
123 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Wagner v. Wagner
115 Misc. 2d 764 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Wilder v. Wilder
93 Misc. 2d 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Ehrenzweig v. Ehrenzweig
86 Misc. 656 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Hoch v. Hoch
80 Misc. 2d 653 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Cooperman v. Cooperman
62 Misc. 2d 745 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
32 Misc. 2d 308 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Mitchell v. Mitchell
194 Misc. 73 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)