Smith v. Smith

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Smith v. Smith

65 A. 869, 72 N.J. Eq. 777, 2 Buchanan 777, 1907 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 133

DecidedFebruary 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A. 869 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 65 A. 869, 72 N.J. Eq. 777, 2 Buchanan 777, 1907 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 133 (N.J. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Leaming, Y. C.

I entertain the view that the executors of the estate of Philip M. Wheaton, deceased, have one year, from May 16th, 1906, in which to pay legacies.

The order made by the orphans court, June 8th, 190-1, admitting the will to probate, was suspended by the appeals to the pre[778]*778rogative court and the court of errors and appeals. Brown v. Ryder, 42 N. J. Eq. (15 Stew.) 356. Operative probate was not effected until the termination of these appeals. May 16th, 1906, certified copies of the decrees of the appellate courts were filed with the surrogate of Cape May county, and probate was on that date adjudged by the surrogate upon proofs made before him by the subscribing witnesses to the will, and letters were then issued. Under Gen. Stat. p. 1938 § 1, the executors are entitled to one year from that date in which to make payment of legacies, where no time is fixed by the will within which such legacies are to be paid. Should the inoperative order of probate made by the orphans court be held to be the probate contemplated by this statute, these executors would have been subjected to actions for all legacies the day after their appointment.

The prayer of the petition must be denied. The petition will be held until the expiration of the year, when the application may be renewed.

No costs will be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leaming, Y. C.

I entertain the view that the executors of the estate of Philip M. Wheaton, deceased, have one year, from May 16th, 1906, in which to pay legacies.

The order made by the orphans court, June 8th, 190-1, admitting the will to probate, was suspended by the appeals to the pre[778]*778rogative court and the court of errors and appeals. Brown v. Ryder, 42 N. J. Eq. (15 Stew.) 356. Operative probate was not effected until the termination of these appeals. May 16th, 1906, certified copies of the decrees of the appellate courts were filed with the surrogate of Cape May county, and probate was on that date adjudged by the surrogate upon proofs made before him by the subscribing witnesses to the will, and letters were then issued. Under Gen. Stat. p. 1938 § 1, the executors are entitled to one year from that date in which to make payment of legacies, where no time is fixed by the will within which such legacies are to be paid. Should the inoperative order of probate made by the orphans court be held to be the probate contemplated by this statute, these executors would have been subjected to actions for all legacies the day after their appointment.

The prayer of the petition must be denied. The petition will be held until the expiration of the year, when the application may be renewed.

No costs will be taxed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A. 869, 72 N.J. Eq. 777, 2 Buchanan 777, 1907 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-njch-1907.