Smith v. Smith

55 N.J. Eq. 821
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedNovember 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 55 N.J. Eq. 821 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Smith, 55 N.J. Eq. 821 (N.J. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — Lippincott, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Hendrickson, Nixon — 6.

For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Dayton — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Citizens Nat. Bank of Collingswood
118 A.2d 108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Skovborg v. Smith
72 A.2d 911 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re Raynolds
27 A.2d 226 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
9 A.2d 311 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Swetland v. Swetland
134 A. 822 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Noice v. Schnell
134 A. 81 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman
97 N.J. Eq. 140 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.J. Eq. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-njch-1896.