Smith v. Smith

55 N.J. Eq. 821
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided November 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — Lippincott, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Hendrickson, Nixon — 6.

For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Dayton — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 55 N.J. Eq. 821 (N.J. Ct. App. 1896).

55 N.J. Eq. 821 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Citizens Nat. Bank of Collingswood
118 A.2d 108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Skovborg v. Smith
72 A.2d 911 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re Raynolds
27 A.2d 226 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
9 A.2d 311 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Swetland v. Swetland
134 A. 822 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Noice v. Schnell
134 A. 81 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman
97 N.J. Eq. 140 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)