Smith v. Smith

100 A. 889, 87 N.J. Eq. 370, 2 Stock. 370, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 445
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 5, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ' Kaliscii, Black, White, Hepreni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 100 A. 889, 87 N.J. Eq. 370, 2 Stock. 370, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 445 (N.J. 1917).

100 A. 889 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Administrators of Smith
28 N.J.L. 208 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1860)