Smith v. Smith
This text of 649 P.2d 1374 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal arising out of the property distribution in a divorce case. On July 12, 1982, respondent filed a document with this court indicating that she wished to waive the filing of an answering brief. On July 15, 1982, we ordered respondent to show cause why we should not treat her waiver as a confession of error. See NRAP 31(c). Respondent has neither filed a brief nor responded to our order to show cause.
Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondent’s conduct as a confession of error. E.g., Walport v. Walport, 98 Nev. 301, 646 P.2d 1215 (1982); Rockwell v. Rockwell, 98 Nev. 80, 640 P.2d 1318 (1982).
This case is reversed and remanded to the district court, with instructions to vacate the order of December 16, 1981.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 P.2d 1374, 98 Nev. 395, 1982 Nev. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-nev-1982.