Smith v. Smith
441 N.W.2d 197, 232 Neb. 507, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 271
Opinion
Petitioner-appellant assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to modify the alimony payments previously awarded respondent-appellee.
As required, we have reviewed the trial court’s action de novo on the record. From that review we determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s application. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Appellee is allowed the sum of $500 for her attorney’s services in this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Smith, 441 N.W.2d 197, 232 Neb. 507, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 271 (Neb. 1989).
441 N.W.2d 197 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bending v. Bending
446 N.W.2d 236 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)