Smith v. Smith

Superior Court of North Carolina

Smith v. Smith

1 N.C. 30

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1791·Published

Opinion

But ASHE, J., concurred in the opinion of Johnston.

NOTE. — See, accordingly, Summer v. Barksdale, post, 328, but it is now provided, since the Act of 1799 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 52, sec. 36), that the acts of the General Assembly shall be in force only from and after thirty days after the termination of the session in which they are passed, and not before, unless otherwise expressly directed in the acts themselves.

Cited: Hamlet v. Taylor, 50 N.C. 38.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But ASHE, J., concurred in the opinion of Johnston.

NOTE. — See, accordingly, Summer v. Barksdale, post, 328, but it is now provided, since the Act of 1799 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 52, sec. 36), that the acts of the General Assembly shall be in force only from and after thirty days after the termination of the session in which they are passed, and not before, unless otherwise expressly directed in the acts themselves.

Cited: Hamlet v. Taylor, 50 N.C. 38.

Smith v. Smith, 1 N.C. 30 (N.C. Ct. App. 1791).

Pincite

1 N.C. 30 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related