Smith v. Smith
This text of 84 S.E.2d 891 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It will serve no useful purpose to narrate tbe accusations and recriminations between plaintiff and defendant concerning tbeir past misconduct. Decision as to custody, in tbe light of all circumstances, was rightly made to turn upon what is now for tbe best interests of tbe children. Griffith v. Griffith, 240 N.C. 271, 81 S.E. 2d 918. The weight to be given tbe conflicting evidence was for determination by tbe court below. Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404, 75 S.E. 2d 133. Competent evidence supports tbe findings of fact, the findings of fact support tbe judgment, and no prejudicial error is shown. Hence, tbe judgment will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.E.2d 891, 241 N.C. 307, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-nc-1954.