Smith v. Smith

84 S.E.2d 891, 241 N.C. 307, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It will serve no useful purpose to narrate tbe accusations and recriminations between plaintiff and defendant concerning tbeir past misconduct. Decision as to custody, in tbe light of all circumstances, was rightly made to turn upon what is now for tbe best interests of tbe children. Griffith v. Griffith, 240 N.C. 271, 81 S.E. 2d 918. The weight to be given tbe conflicting evidence was for determination by tbe court below. Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404, 75 S.E. 2d 133. Competent evidence supports tbe findings of fact, the findings of fact support tbe judgment, and no prejudicial error is shown. Hence, tbe judgment will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 84 S.E.2d 891, 241 N.C. 307, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 580 (N.C. 1954).

84 S.E.2d 891 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanback v. Stanback
145 S.E.2d 332 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Kovacs v. Brewer
97 S.E.2d 96 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)