Smith v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. Smith

399 S.W.3d 928, 2013 WL 2431982, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 672

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. ED 99050·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs filed a petition to remove Freddie E. Smith (“Fred”) as trustee of the Geneva N. Smith Trust (“the Trust”) alleging he breached his fiduciary duty.¹ The court found Fred had breached the Trust and removed Fred as trustee. Further, the court ordered Fred to reimburse the Trust for damages suffered from the breach and to pay Plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees. Fred appeals the trial court’s judgment as it relates to the damages and attorney’s fees. We find no trial court error; therefore, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs filed a petition to remove Freddie E. Smith (“Fred”) as trustee of the Geneva N. Smith Trust (“the Trust”) alleging he breached his fiduciary duty.¹ The court found Fred had breached the Trust and removed Fred as trustee. Further, the court ordered Fred to reimburse the Trust for damages suffered from the breach and to pay Plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees. Fred appeals the trial court’s judgment as it relates to the damages and attorney’s fees. We find no trial court error; therefore, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Smith v. Smith, 399 S.W.3d 928, 2013 WL 2431982, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 672 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 928 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.