Smith v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Smith v. Smith

225 N.E.2d 590, 352 Mass. 766

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 30, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 225 N.E.2d 590 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 225 N.E.2d 590, 352 Mass. 766 (Mass. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

This appeal from a final decree of the Probate Court of Essex County disallowing the petition for probate of the will of Joseph F. Smith challenges the judge’s findings that the testator was not of sound mind on May 16, 1962, when the proposed will was executed, and that the proposed will was procured by undue influence. Either ground would be sufficient to disallow the will. We dispose of the appeal on the first ground. The evidence, consisting almost exclusively of oral testimony, is reported. The judge’s report of material facts consisting of twelve [767]*767printed pages shows that the testator, who had been in good health, suffered a stroke in March, 1960, at the age of seventy-nine, and thereafter deteriorated rapidly, both physically and mentally, until his death on December 22, 1963. During this period he was almost constantly under the care of doctors. He had numerous and complicated serious physical ailments, had lost control of his bodily functions and was unable to care for himself. The testator entered a hospital in April, 1962, for thirteen days. He was then senile and incoherent. On his return home he showed great confusion and did not seem to recognize his children. The judge’s finding that the testator was not of sound mind at the time the proposed will was executed cannot be said to be plainly wrong. Needham Trust Co. v. Cookson, 251 Mass. 160. Hiller v. Hiller, 305 Mass. 163.

F. Dale Vincent for Joseph Warren Smith. Edward J. Bushell (Ralph G. Howland with him) for the contestants.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This appeal from a final decree of the Probate Court of Essex County disallowing the petition for probate of the will of Joseph F. Smith challenges the judge’s findings that the testator was not of sound mind on May 16, 1962, when the proposed will was executed, and that the proposed will was procured by undue influence. Either ground would be sufficient to disallow the will. We dispose of the appeal on the first ground. The evidence, consisting almost exclusively of oral testimony, is reported. The judge’s report of material facts consisting of twelve [767]*767printed pages shows that the testator, who had been in good health, suffered a stroke in March, 1960, at the age of seventy-nine, and thereafter deteriorated rapidly, both physically and mentally, until his death on December 22, 1963. During this period he was almost constantly under the care of doctors. He had numerous and complicated serious physical ailments, had lost control of his bodily functions and was unable to care for himself. The testator entered a hospital in April, 1962, for thirteen days. He was then senile and incoherent. On his return home he showed great confusion and did not seem to recognize his children. The judge’s finding that the testator was not of sound mind at the time the proposed will was executed cannot be said to be plainly wrong. Needham Trust Co. v. Cookson, 251 Mass. 160. Hiller v. Hiller, 305 Mass. 163.

F. Dale Vincent for Joseph Warren Smith. Edward J. Bushell (Ralph G. Howland with him) for the contestants.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 N.E.2d 590, 352 Mass. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-mass-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack