Smith v. Smith

117 Mass. 72, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 155
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 13, 1875·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Hunneman is not shown to have had any authority from the corporation to' discharge the Ring mortgage.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 117 Mass. 72, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 155 (Mass. 1875).

117 Mass. 72 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pritchard v. Uphams Corner Theatre Co.
131 N.E. 70 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
England v. Dearborn
6 N.E. 837 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)