Smith v. Smith

177 S.E.2d 230, 226 Ga. 748, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 667
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1970
Docket26001
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 177 S.E.2d 230 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Smith, 177 S.E.2d 230, 226 Ga. 748, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 667 (Ga. 1970).

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

This case is controlled by the decision rendered in Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771, and the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. *749 Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorneys General, B. Daniel Dubberly, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Lewis B. Slaton, District Attorney, Carter Goode, Tony H. Hight, for appellant. Jack Henry Smith, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bassett v. Smith
182 S.E.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Hart v. Smith
180 S.E.2d 735 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Stynchcombe v. Clements
179 S.E.2d 917 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Smith v. Smith
321 F. Supp. 482 (N.D. Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E.2d 230, 226 Ga. 748, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ga-1970.