Smith v. Smith

146 S.E.2d 721, 221 Ga. 619, 1966 Ga. LEXIS 648
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 6, 1966·No. 23219·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

“Whenever a motion for directed verdict, made at the close of all the evidence, is denied, or for any reason is not granted, a party who has” so moved may make a further motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or'the mistrial as the case may be. (Emphasis supplied). Code Ann. § 110-113 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 441; 1957, pp. 224, 236). Here, after a request for a continuance on account of illness of counsel for the plaintiff after examination of only two witnesses for the plaintiff, the motion by the defendant for directed verdict was not in order. See Green v. Green, 138 Ga. 581 (2) (75 SE 603); Spivey v. Barwick, 157 Ga. 853 (122 SE 594); Cowart v. Smith, 182 Ga. 511 (185 SE 819). Nor was the motion for judgment notwithstanding the mistrial in order, and the lower court erred in granting same.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 146 S.E.2d 721, 221 Ga. 619, 1966 Ga. LEXIS 648 (Ga. 1966).

146 S.E.2d 721 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jerry Campbell
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Smith v. Smith
168 S.E.2d 878 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)