Smith v. Smith

44 S.E.2d 486, 202 Ga. 759, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 512
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 5, 1947·No. 15924.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Presiding Justice.

1. Delivery of a deed conveying real property is essential to its validity, and is complete only when the deed is accepted. Stallings v. Newton, 110 Ga. 875 (36 S. E. 227); Scarborough v. Holder, 127 Ga. 256, 261 (56 S. E. 293) ; Epps v. Heard, 168 Ga. 561, 564 (148 S. E. 336).

2. In the present case, where the controlling issue was as to whether there had been delivery to the plaintiffs in error, as grantees in a voluntary deed under which they claimed title against the administratrix of the deceased grantor, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that delivery with acceptance had not been made, and to return the verdict in favor of the administratrix.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 44 S.E.2d 486, 202 Ga. 759, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 512 (Ga. 1947).

44 S.E.2d 486 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James B. Woods, Sr. v. Independent Fire Insurance Company
749 F.2d 1493 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Nicholson v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 299 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Domestic Loans of Washington, Inc. v. Wilder
149 S.E.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Kirby v. Johnson
65 S.E.2d 811 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)