Smith v. Smith
This text of 44 S.E.2d 486 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Delivery of a deed conveying real property is essential to its validity, and is complete only when the deed is accepted. Stallings v. Newton, 110 Ga. 875 (36 S. E. 227); Scarborough v. Holder, 127 Ga. 256, 261 (56 S. E. 293) ; Epps v. Heard, 168 Ga. 561, 564 (148 S. E. 336).
2. In the present case, where the controlling issue was as to whether there had been delivery to the plaintiffs in error, as grantees in a voluntary deed under which they claimed title against the administratrix of the deceased grantor, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that delivery with acceptance had not been made, and to return the verdict in favor of the administratrix.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 S.E.2d 486, 202 Ga. 759, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-ga-1947.