Smith v. Smith

228 So. 3d 152, 2017 WL 4679730
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9908
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2017·No. No. 4D14-1436·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Damoorgian, J.

We reconsider on remand our opinion in Smith v. Smith, 199 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), which was quashed by the Florida Supreme Court following its decision in Smith v. Smith, 224 So.3d 740 (Fla. 2017). As ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, we remand and direct the trial court to vacate its final judgment annulling Glenda Martinez Smith’s marriage to J. Alan Smith. The trial court is also directed to vacate its order denying Glenda Martinez Smith’s motion to ratify or approve the marriage based on its conclusion that the marriage could not be ratified after the fact. As clarified by the Florida Supreme Court, although the marriage as it stands now is invalid, “the parties are not foreclosed from seeking court approval in further proceedings. Id. at 751.

Reversed and remanded.

Warner and May, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 228 So. 3d 152, 2017 WL 4679730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

228 So. 3d 152 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenda Martinez Smith v. J. Alan Smith
199 So. 3d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Glenda Martinez Smith v. J. Alan Smith
224 So. 3d 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)