Smith v. Smith

932 So. 2d 588, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10779, 2006 WL 1787993
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 902 So. 2d 859
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 2006·No. No. 5D05-2343·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Pullo v. Pullo, 926 So.2d 448, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (en banc) (Kahn, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“Florida courts uniformly agree that section 61.14(1), Florida Statutes, does not allow modification of a property distribution.”).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 932 So. 2d 588, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10779, 2006 WL 1787993 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

932 So. 2d 588 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pullo v. Pullo
926 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)