Smith v. Smith

689 So. 2d 1312, 1997 WL 138368
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1997·No. 96-2416·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

689 So.2d 1312 (1997)

Steven Daniel SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Rebecca Jane SMITH, Appellee.

No. 96-2416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 27, 1997.

Peter Cushing, Orlando, for Appellant.

Henry L. Perla, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of dissolution of marriage is reversed, except for that portion dissolving the marriage, based on the trial court's failure to make the specific findings of fact mandated by subsection 61.08(1), Florida Statutes (1995). See Rausch v. Rausch, 680 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We note that there is no provision in the law for "nonmodifiable permanent alimony" and order that provision stricken upon remand.[1]

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] The final judgment was signed by the Honorable Robert M. Evans, Circuit Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 689 So. 2d 1312, 1997 WL 138368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 1312 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pipitone v. Pipitone
23 So. 3d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Betancourt v. Nunez
962 So. 2d 940 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Nethery v. Nethery
951 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Freilich v. Freilich
897 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)