Smith v. Smith
This text of 689 So. 2d 1312 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven Daniel SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Rebecca Jane SMITH, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Peter Cushing, Orlando, for Appellant.
Henry L. Perla, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of dissolution of marriage is reversed, except for that portion dissolving the marriage, based on the trial court's failure to make the specific findings of fact mandated by subsection 61.08(1), Florida Statutes (1995). See Rausch v. Rausch, 680 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We note that there is no provision in the law for "nonmodifiable permanent alimony" and order that provision stricken upon remand.[1]
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] The final judgment was signed by the Honorable Robert M. Evans, Circuit Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 1312, 1997 WL 138368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-fladistctapp-1997.