Smith v. Smith

550 So. 2d 15, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1989 WL 75511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1989·No. No. 88-1685·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Seitz v. Seitz, 471 So.2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Arsht v. Arsht, 467 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Brancolino v. Carretta, 463 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Manley v. Manley, 360 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 550 So. 2d 15, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3860, 1989 WL 75511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 15 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Weisbrot
550 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)